Question:
Why don't China n' S Korea seize Japan's new warship for Japan dumping the radioactive water?
Dog Lover And Puppies Love Jesus Christ
2013-09-05 14:50:22 UTC
Japan's self inflicted problem in the Fukushima radiation leak is creating life threatening health issues to the civilians of her neighboring countries and that, China and Korea will be forced to spend Trillions of dollars in treating all the illnesses brought about by Japan's radiation leakage.

I said it is Japan's self inflicted problem is because Japan built all her 59 nuclear power plants not for peaceful use but for producing the Nuclear weapon material, as everyone knows.

Instead of spending money on stopping the radiation leakage, Japan spent billions of dollars in making the fancy big warship, to allow the radiation continues to damage her neighbors.

Why don't China and S Korea, the victims of Japan's aggression and now victims of Japan's radiation leak, joint together to confiscate Japan's new fancy warship as a compensation for Japan's irresponsible act of enlarging the radiation contaminated area ?

Thanks for your answers.
.
Seven answers:
Matthew
2013-09-05 15:09:57 UTC
You are a moron. You have no idea how any of that works.



1) Reactors used to generate power are built differently than reactors used to make plutonium. Japan most certainly did NOT build a bunch of weapon-producing nuclear plants. Why didn't they? Because the US demilitarized Japan after WWII and Japan can't do a single thing without the US crawling in to take a look. There is no such thing as a purely Japanese military facility (though there are joint bases with the US). There is no such thing as a Japanese military, period. They have a self defense force (the SDF, as it is aptly called) which the US monitors and regulates. There is no earthly way for Japan to build a bunch of nukes without US involvement.



2) Radiation is naturally occurring everywhere all the time (It is in water with heavy hydrogen, in all living materials with carbon-14, every plant, every tree, every stone, and even sunlight) and it takes MASSIVE quantities to be dangerous.



WATER ITSELF is a pretty good radiation shield. The tenth-thickness (the amount of a material necessary to reduce the radiation to one tenth (.1) of its original value) of water is a couple inches to a couple feet (depending on the source). China and Korea are most certainly NOT in danger with miles of ocean between them. Five miles down the beach isn't even in any danger.
Morning star
2013-09-05 22:05:31 UTC
Wow just wow do some research, I have a lot to say to what you think but I will not waste my time as it sounds your hell bent on hating the japanese. Just remember the US has caused a lot of pain and damage them selves who is going to make them pay. what has happened in japan was totally out of their control (remember earthquakes and tsunami) and yes they might not be handling it well, but no 1 has been in a situation like this before so there will be mistakes. Also do you forget the US is the protectors of Japan, Japan is only allowed a defence force. By china and south korea taking ships from japan would be an act of war and the US would be forced to step in, and to be quite honest the US could do without the trouble espically with them busting a gut to cause havoc in syria.





@ Miao Tsetung I would rather have peace to be honest. I am fed up of countries being at each others throats over stuff that happened years if not centuries ago. Seems like you have a chip on your shoulder pal, Im guessing your from the US i pity you
Lim Yuan
2013-09-06 05:28:20 UTC
First of all its not self inflicted it was a result of a natural disaster, your highly offensive remark on a par of saying that the destruction of Wenchuan country is self inflicted because they build it there.



It would just be like Japan seizing China's warship for the dumping of ammonia into the environment not to mention millions of other pollutants into the air.



Not only that but Korea should seize China's warship for the dust storms China causes which are showing signs of radioactively due to China's nuclear powers stations reports Korea's nuclear watchdog.



http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/national/2011/03/20/52/0301000000AEN20110320000400315F.HTML



It seems China has been poisoning Korea much longer than Japan has been.



But they don't seize ships because in the end China and Korea have no authority to carry out such action, just like Korea has no authority to seize China's floating casino.
?
2013-09-06 11:27:37 UTC
No Japan needs the extra ones to nuke people like you! Leave Japan alone, Japan is suffering you dam* heartless motherfreaker. Why don't you go over there and tell Japan yourself about how you feel & last time I heard that the leak was heading towards the US not S. Korea/China and hopefully if it does reach all countries everyone can pitch in and help Japan fix it and resolve it quicker.

Japan is desperately trying to solve the problem don't act like EVERYONE is sitting down twittling their thumbs and letting it happen on purpose without looking for a way to solve this unfortunate mishap. Nihon ganbatte kudasai/日本がんばって ください!(don't even know if my grammars right but its the thought that counts)
sailor8
2013-09-07 00:38:31 UTC
Other than the obvious, it was said here by several. South Korea is not the CCP's puppet so they would not help the CCP and the CCP does not have anything that could get close to that ship, let alone board and take command.
?
2013-09-06 07:10:04 UTC
Let's have Americans seize Shanghai because of China's refusal to pays its sovereign debts:





http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/08/26/its-time-for-china-to-pay-its-debts-to-united-states/





Maybe Morningstar would like it if most of the world seized British assets to pay for its enslavement of half the world in the last century. Self-righteous much?
Liu Maoxing
2013-09-06 08:40:46 UTC
I think Japan and South Korea should seized China instead, because China ever sold poisonous dumplings to Japan.



http://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/1293040/hebei-dumpling-poisoner-stands-trial


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...